After C++, what with Python?
Paul Rubin
no.email at nospam.invalid
Sun Jan 16 03:53:20 EST 2011
Tim Harig <usernet at ilthio.net> writes:
> Those who are concerned about performance should check out Go.
> Garbage collection, duck typing, and compiles to a native binary.
> It creates a great middle ground between C++ and Python. Any C and/or
> Python programmer will feel right at home with the language. It is
> still a young language; but, I have been using it for some useful things.
Go has some nice aspects but it is much lower level than Python. If you
want a statically typed, compiled language closer to Python's level, I
know of some projects that have switched from Python to Ocaml. If you
want dynamic types, I guess there's Dylan, Lisp, or possibly Erlang.
There is also Haskell, but I think using it takes a much different
mind-set than Python usually brings out.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list