Inconsistencies between zipfile and tarfile APIs
Ned Deily
nad at acm.org
Fri Jul 22 17:17:23 EDT 2011
In article <j0cjaf$mum$1 at dough.gmane.org>,
Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote:
> This introduced the problem that upgrading to Python 3 is no longer a
> single thing. We really need 2to3.1 (the current 2to3), 2to3.2, 2to3.3,
> etc, but someone would have to make the new versions, but no one,
> currently, has the energy and interest to do that. So people who did not
> port their 2.x code early now use the problem of multiple Python 3
> targets as another excuse not to do so now. (Actually, most 2.x code
> should not be ported, but their are more libraries that we do need in 3.x.)
I don't quite understand this. Since 2to3 is included with Python 3,
there are, in fact, separate releases of 2to3 for each release of Python
3 so far. And, unlike with Python 2 with a large installed base across
a number of versions, Python 3 version support can be and is much more
focused now in its early releases. Support for 3.0 was terminated
immediately upon release of 3.1. And 3.1 is now in security-fix mode
only. So, except for a brief overlap after the initial release of 3.2,
there has only been one Python 3 release that needs to be targeted. Of
course, that will change over time as adoption continues and mainstream
OS's include specific Python 3 releases. But, for now, it's easy: just
target the most recent Python 3 release, currently 3.2.1. Don't worry
about earlier releases.
--
Ned Deily,
nad at acm.org
More information about the Python-list
mailing list