Convert '165.0' to int
greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Sun Jul 24 20:04:49 EDT 2011
Frank Millman wrote:
> I know I am flogging a dead horse here, but IMHO, '165', '165.',
> '165.0', and '165.00' are all valid string representations of the
> integer 165.
> Therefore, for practical purposes, it would not be wrong for python's
> 'int' function to accept these without complaining.
How far would you go with that? Would you also accept
'1.65e2' as a valid representation of the integer 165?
More information about the Python-list