functools.partial doesn't work without using named parameter
Paddy
paddy3118 at googlemail.com
Fri Mar 25 03:21:59 EDT 2011
Thanks Ian, Benjamin, and Steven.
I now know why it works as it does.
Thinking about it a little more, Is it reasonable to *expect* partial acts as it does, rather than this way being an implementation convenience? (That was written as a straight question not in any way as a dig).
I had thought that partial had enough information to, and would in fact, remove named parameter f from the signature of fsf1 returning something that could be called that is the equivalent of:
def fsf1_( s ): ...
I accept that that is not done, but would welcome discussion on if my expectation above was reasonable.
Thanks guys :-)
More information about the Python-list
mailing list