Fibonacci series recursion error

[rusi]

On May 3, 5:21 am, Steven D'Aprano <steve
+comp.lang.pyt... at pearwood.info> wrote:
> On Mon, 02 May 2011 21:02:43 +0100, Hans Georg Schaathun wrote:
> > The other arguments are valid.  And they make me lean more towards more
> > static, compiled languages without the excessive run-time dynamism of
> > python.
>
> If you value runtime efficiency over development time, sure. There are
> plenty of languages which have made that decision: Pascal, C, Java, Lisp,
> Forth, and many more.

Or Haskell:

Succinctness like python
Type safety better than C, C++, Java with a minimum of type
declarations