Today's fun and educational Python recipe
Terry Reedy
tjreedy at udel.edu
Wed May 4 20:26:51 EDT 2011
On 5/4/2011 5:39 PM, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> The 512 bits in h are progressively eaten-up between iterations. So
> each pass yields a different (array index, bit_mask) pair.
Yeh, obvious now that I see it.
> It's easy to use the interactive prompt to show that different probes
> are produced on each pass:
>
>>>> bf = BloomFilter(num_bits=1000, num_probes=8)
>>>> pprint(list(bf.get_probes('Alabama')))
> [(19, 1073741824),
> (11, 64),
> (9, 134217728),
> (25, 1024),
> (24, 33554432),
> (6, 16),
> (7, 16777216),
> (22, 1048576)]
Should have tried that.
> The 512 bits are uncorrelated -- otherwise sha512 wouldn't be much of
> a cryptographic hash ;)
> The fifty state example in the recipe is a reasonable demonstration
> that the recipe works as advertised. It successfully finds all fifty
> states (the true positives) and it tries 100,000 negatives resulting
> in only a handful of false negatives.
I presume you mean 'false positives', as in the program comment and
Wikipedia.
The test would be more convincing to many with 100000 other geographic
names (hard to come by, I know), or other english names or words or even
with longer random strings that matched the lengths of the state names.
But an average of 5/100000 false positives in 5 runs is good.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
More information about the Python-list
mailing list