Why did Quora choose Python for its development?
D'Arcy J.M. Cain
darcy at druid.net
Tue May 24 06:05:35 EDT 2011
On Tue, 24 May 2011 09:00:14 +0300
"Octavian Rasnita" <orasnita at gmail.com> wrote:
> So, again, in Perl is just:
>
> %d = @l;
>
> Please tell me if Python has a syntax which is more clear than this for
> doing this thing.
How is that clear? "Shorter" != "clearer." A Python programmer
looking at that sees line noise. A Perl programmer looking at "d = dict
([a])" (or even "d = dict(a,)") sees something that has something to do
with creating a dictionary. At least he would know in which section of
the manual to look for more information.
> And again, I am not trolling anything. I am just defending a language which
> has a clearer syntax for doing some things, and a shorter code for other
Are Perl programmers aware of some imminent worldwide shortage of
electrons that Python programmers are not? Why is there this obsession
with shortness?
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy at druid.net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list