"IX" as shorthand for "Interface"

[Eric Snow]

On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Chris Rebert <clp2 at rebertia.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Eric Snow <ericsnowcurrently at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm writing a bunch of classes that have "Interface" in the name and
>> find that the length of the subsequent names is starting to get in the
>> way of readability (I don't really care about saving keystrokes).  Is
>> "IX" conventional enough to use in place of "Interface" in a class
>> name?  Thanks!
>
> But classes and interfaces are distinct concepts...
>
> - Chris
>

I saw what you did right there!  <wink>  Be that as it may, is "IX" a
common enough abbreviation?

-eric