Usefulness of the "not in" operator

[Tim Roberts]

Roy Smith <roy at panix.com> wrote:
>In article <4e906108$0$27980$426a34cc at news.free.fr>,
> candide <candide at free.invalid> wrote:
>
>> After browsing source code, I realize that parenthesis are not necessary 
>> ("not" has higher precedence than "in").
>
>Here's my take on parenthesis:  If you need to look up whether they're 
>necessary or not, they are :-)

Amen.  +1
-- 
Tim Roberts, timr at probo.com
Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc.