"IX" as shorthand for "Interface"

[Chris Rebert]

On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Eric Snow <ericsnowcurrently at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm writing a bunch of classes that have "Interface" in the name and
> find that the length of the subsequent names is starting to get in the
> way of readability (I don't really care about saving keystrokes).  Is
> "IX" conventional enough to use in place of "Interface" in a class
> name?  Thanks!

But classes and interfaces are distinct concepts...

- Chris