revive a generator

[Yingjie Lan]

----- Original Message -----

> From: Paul Rudin <paul.nospam at rudin.co.uk>
> 
> I'm not really sure whether you intend g to yield the original values
> after your "revive" or new values based on the new value of vo.  But
> still you can make a class that supports the iterator protocol and does
> whatever you want (but you can't use the generator expression syntax).
> 
> If you want something along these lines you should probably read up on
> the .send() part of the generator protocol.
> 
> As an aside you shouldn't really write code that uses a global in that
> way.. it'll end up biting you eventually.
> 
> Anyway... we can speculate endlessly about non-existent language
> constructs, but I think we've probably done this one to death.
> -- 


Maybe no new language construct is needed:
just define that x.send() revives a generator.

Yingjie