os independent rename

[Cameron Simpson]

On 17Sep2011 20:18, Nobody <nobody at nowhere.com> wrote:
| On Sat, 17 Sep 2011 20:28:32 +0430, Lee Harr wrote:
| > So, what is the best way to do this that will
| > behave the same across operating systems?
| 
| Delete the destination first, but after checking that it isn't the same as
| the source.

This is usually a step that the UNIX os.rename is designed to avoid.
By deleting first, there is a window where the destination doesn't exist
at all. Also, if the subsequent rename fails, the destination is missing
long term. os.rename() on UNIX specifies that after the call either the
new items is at destination (success) or the old item is (failure).
Either way you still have a valid destination object.

So you're breaking the model that os.rename() strives explicitly to
provide.

Cheers,
-- 
Cameron Simpson <cs at zip.com.au> DoD#743
http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/

Q: How many user support people does it take to change a light bulb?
A: We have an exact copy of the light bulb here and it seems to be
   working fine.  Can you tell me what kind of system you have?