Is __ne__ method autogenerated?
ian.g.kelly at gmail.com
Fri Dec 7 07:37:42 CET 2012
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:03 PM, INADA Naoki <songofacandy at gmail.com> wrote:
> The reference says:
> The truth of x==y does not imply that x!=y is false.
> Accordingly, when defining __eq__(), one should also
> define __ne__() so that the operators will behave as expected.
> But I saw different behavior on 3.3:
> Could anyone teach me what happen about my code?
I can't find it documented anywhere else.
More information about the Python-list