Is __ne__ method autogenerated?
songofacandy at gmail.com
Fri Dec 7 07:48:30 CET 2012
Thanks a million!
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Chris Rebert <clp2 at rebertia.com> wrote:
> On Thursday, December 6, 2012, INADA Naoki wrote:
>> The reference says:
>> The truth of x==y does not imply that x!=y is false.
>> Accordingly, when defining __eq__(), one should also
>> define __ne__() so that the operators will behave as expected.
>> But I saw different behavior on 3.3:
>> Could anyone teach me what happen about my code?
> The reference is not completely accurate in this case. See
> "Document auto __ne__ generation; [...]"
INADA Naoki <songofacandy at gmail.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Python-list