Confused about logger config from within Python (3)

Terry Reedy tjreedy at udel.edu
Sun Dec 30 01:18:46 CET 2012


On 12/29/2012 8:48 AM, Roy Smith wrote:
> In article <50de7a0a$0$29967$c3e8da3$5496439d at news.astraweb.com>,
>   Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python at pearwood.info> wrote:
>
>> In Python 3.2 and 3.3, the message about no handlers is not printed,
>> which is an interesting difference. (Somebody who knows more about the
>> logging package than I do might be able to state why that difference.)
>
> I hope that means that http://bugs.python.org/issue994421 has finally
> been fixed :-)

I added an update ;-).

If Vijay wanted the message to be a warning rather than an exception, 
the warnings module and mechanism could have been used (once it was 
available -- I am not sure when that was). But I think a default handler 
is even better.

Given that you disagreed with his disposition of the issue, you might 
have posted to this list for other opinions.

I also hope you appreciate that Vijay has stuck with maintenance and 
upgrade of the module for nearly a decade now.

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy




More information about the Python-list mailing list