Common LISP-style closures with Python
Antti J Ylikoski
antti.ylikoski at tkk.fi
Sat Feb 4 08:09:14 EST 2012
On 4.2.2012 12:58, Arnaud Delobelle wrote:
> On 4 February 2012 10:14, Antti J Ylikoski<antti.ylikoski at tkk.fi> wrote:
>> On 4.2.2012 4:47, Chris Rebert wrote:
>>> Out of curiosity, what would be non-Common-Lisp-style closures?
>> I understand that a "closure" is something which is typical of functional
>> programming languages. -- Scheme-style closures, for example.
>> I don't know Haskell, ML etc. but I do suspect that we could create closures
>> in those languages as well. Maybe someone more expert than me can help?
> I think what Chris asking is: what is the feature of Common-Lisp
> closures that Python closures share but other languages don't?
> I think what he is implying is that there is no such feature. Python
> closures are no more "Common-Lisp-style" than they are "Scheme-style"
> or "Smalltalk-like" or any other language-like.
I would say that Python closures are equivalent with Common LISP
closures (except that LAMBDA is more limited in Python, which is a
feature which I don't like.)
Do you maybe mean non-Common-LISP-style closures in Python? I cannot
think of any ones.
kind regards, Andy
More information about the Python-list