Common LISP-style closures with Python
Ian Kelly
ian.g.kelly at gmail.com
Sun Feb 5 15:58:31 EST 2012
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Antti J Ylikoski <antti.ylikoski at tkk.fi> wrote:
>> I'm not sure how naughty this is, but the same thing can be done without
>> using
>> nonlocal by storing the local state as an attribute of the enclosed
>> function
>> object:
>>
>> ...
>
> Yes, I do know that, but then it would not be a closure :-)))))))))
Sure it is. Where do you think it looks up the function object?
Cheers,
Ian
More information about the Python-list
mailing list