breamoreboy at yahoo.co.uk
Tue Jul 17 20:03:19 CEST 2012
On 17/07/2012 18:49, Prasad, Ramit wrote:
>>> import unittest
>>> class TestWithRaises(unittest.TestCase):
>>> def test_first(self):
>>> assert False
>>> def test_second(self):
>>> print("also called")
>>> assert True
>>> if __name__ == '__main__':
>>> in this case also the second test is run even if the first fails..
>> The reason for that is that the unit testing framework catches and
>> handles the error. It calls both test functions in some unspecified
>> order and logs the result. Calls to two separate test functions are
>> thereby separated from each other. This is intentionally so, but I think
>> you can also give the unit testing framework a flag that makes it abort
>> after the first error. In no way will the exception escape from the
>> unittest.main() call though, it is all caught and handled inside, also
>> by intention.
>>> But that's probably easy because we just need to catch exceptions for
>>> every method call, so it's not exactly the same thing..
>> I don't understand what you want to say here. I also don't understand
>> what your problem in general is. I guess there are some expectations
>> which are not satisfied, but you haven't explained those explicitly yet.
> I think Andrea wants to do the same thing but with nose and not
> This email is confidential and subject to important disclaimers and
> conditions including on offers for the purchase or sale of
> securities, accuracy and completeness of information, viruses,
> confidentiality, legal privilege, and legal entity disclaimers,
> available at http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures/email.
Do what? Like Ulrich Eckhart I simply don't understand what she's
getting at. Perhaps it's a problem with Englsh being a second language
issue rather than Python itself. Thankfully I'm sure that everything
will come out in the wash.
More information about the Python-list