Linux shell to python

88888 Dihedral dihedral88888 at googlemail.com
Tue Jul 31 21:01:38 CEST 2012


Mark Lawrence於 2012年7月31日星期二UTC+8下午3時15分32秒寫道:
> On 31/07/2012 02:20, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 22:56:48 +0000, Dan Stromberg <drsalists at gmail.com>
> 
> > declaimed the following in gmane.comp.python.general:
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> >> Sigh, and I'm also not keen on multi-line list comprehensions, specifically
> 
> >> because I think they tend to make less readable code.  It also becomes a
> 
> >> mess when you need to insert print statements to get some visibility into
> 
> >> what's going on.
> 
> >
> 
> > 	Cleanly splitting the list-comp by
> 
> >
> 
> > 	[ result-computation
> 
> > 		for-item-selection-clause
> 
> > 		if-filter-clause ]
> 
> >
> 
> > isn't that unreadable... But anyone doing
> 
> >
> 
> > 	[ result-
> 
> > 		-computation for-item-
> 
> > 		-selection-clause if-
> 
> > 		-filter-
> 
> > 		-clause ]
> 
> >
> 
> > should be pecked to death by a dead parrot.
> 
> >
> 
> 
> 
> Any particular species?
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Cheers.
> 
> 
> 
> Mark Lawrence.

For each item in the known list that passes the required conditional test,
then  use the item to perform the tasks desired as instructed.

It is not necessary that a new list has to be constructed in the tasks.

A method which can produce a new object always involves some memory management. 
Therefore,  some error handling part should not be missing.





More information about the Python-list mailing list