code review

[Littlefield, Tyler]

On 7/3/2012 10:55 PM, Simon Cropper wrote:
> Some questions to Tyler Littlefield, who started this thread.
>
> Q1 -- Did you get any constructive feedback on your code?

I did get some, which I appreciated. someone mentioned using PyLint. 
 From reading, I found it was really really pedantic, so I used PyFlakes 
instead.
>
> Q2 -- Did you feel that the process of submitting your code for review 
> met your expectation?

There wasn't much more to review, so yes. The info I got was helpful and 
farther than it was before I started.

> Q3 -- Would you recommend others doing this either on this forum or 
> other fora?
>
> It appears to me - third party watching the ongoing dialog - that the 
> tread has gone right off topic (some time ago) and someone should 
> really start a new thread under a new title/subject. Most of what I 
> have read does not appear to be discussing your code or how you could 
> improve your code.
>
I basically just stopped after a while. It got into a my language is 
better than your language, so I didn't see much constructive info. I've 
started reading from the bottom though, where it looks like it's back, 
and I do appreciate the rest of the info given, as well. Thanks again 
for the feedback.

> Following the last few posts, I was wondering whether some other 
> off-list dialog is going on or whether I am missing something.
>


-- 
Take care,
Ty
http://tds-solutions.net
The aspen project: a barebones light-weight mud engine:
http://code.google.com/p/aspenmud
He that will not reason is a bigot; he that cannot reason is a fool; he that dares not reason is a slave.