Apology for OT posts (was: code review)

[John O'Hagan]

On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 23:39:20 -0600
"Littlefield, Tyler" <tyler at tysdomain.com> wrote:

> On 7/3/2012 10:55 PM, Simon Cropper wrote:
> > Some questions to Tyler Littlefield, who started this thread.
> >
> > Q1 -- Did you get any constructive feedback on your code?
> 
> I did get some, which I appreciated. someone mentioned using PyLint. 
>  From reading, I found it was really really pedantic, so I used PyFlakes 
> instead.
> >
> > Q2 -- Did you feel that the process of submitting your code for review 
> > met your expectation?
> 
> There wasn't much more to review, so yes. The info I got was helpful and 
> farther than it was before I started.
> 
> > Q3 -- Would you recommend others doing this either on this forum or 
> > other fora?
> >
> > It appears to me - third party watching the ongoing dialog - that the 
> > tread has gone right off topic (some time ago) and someone should 
> > really start a new thread under a new title/subject. Most of what I 
> > have read does not appear to be discussing your code or how you could 
> > improve your code.
> >
> I basically just stopped after a while. It got into a my language is 
> better than your language, so I didn't see much constructive info. I've 
> started reading from the bottom though, where it looks like it's back, 
> and I do appreciate the rest of the info given, as well. Thanks again 
> for the feedback.
> 

As one of the perpetrators, I did apologise for being OT within the body of my
replies to OT posts, but I see the irony. I guess I just thought somebody else
would do it eventually. I hereby apologise for not taking the correct action,
and vow to do so in future: to change the subject line regardless of who
initially went OT, starting now.

Regards,
--
John