Issues with `codecs.register` and `codecs.CodecInfo` objects
Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.python at pearwood.info
Fri Jul 6 22:56:13 EDT 2012
On Fri, 06 Jul 2012 12:55:31 -0400, Karl Knechtel wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> While attempting to make a wrapper for opening multiple types of
> UTF-encoded files (more on that later, in a separate post, I guess), I
> ran into some oddities with the `codecs` module, specifically to do with
> `.register` ing `CodecInfo` objects. I'd like to report a bug or
> something, but there are several intertangled issues here and I'm not
> really sure how to report it so I thought I'd open the discussion.
> Apologies in advance if I get a bit rant-y, and a warning that this is
> fairly long.
[...]
Yes, it's a strangely indirect API, and yes it looks like you have
identified a whole bucket full of problems with it. And no, I don't know
why that API was chosen.
Changing to a cleaner, more direct (sensible?) API would be a fairly big
step. If you want to pursue this, the steps I recommend you take are:
1) understanding the reason for the old API (search the Internet
and particularly the python-dev at python.org archives);
2) have a plan for how to avoid breaking code that relies on the
existing API;
3) raise the issue on python-ideas at python.org to gather feedback
and see how much opposition or support it is likely to get;
they'll suggest whether a bug report is sufficient or if you'll
need a PEP;
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/
If you can provide a patch and a test suite, you will have a much better
chance of pushing it through. If not, you are reliant on somebody else
who can being interested enough to do the work.
And one last thing: any new functionality will simply *not* be considered
for Python 2.x. Aim for Python 3.4, since the 2.x series is now in bug-
fix only maintenance mode and the 3.3 beta is no longer accepting new
functionality, only bug fixes.
--
Steven
More information about the Python-list
mailing list