Python is readable
torriem at gmail.com
Sat Mar 17 00:39:21 CET 2012
On 03/16/2012 10:48 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 13:10:12 +0100, Kiuhnm wrote:
>> Maybe we should define *exactly* what readability is (in less then 500
>> lines, if possible).
> If you can't be bothered to read my post before replying, save yourself
> some more time and don't bother to reply at all.
> I quote from the part of the my post you deleted:
> When people talk about readability, they normally mean to
> ask how much mental effort is needed to interpret the
> meaning of the text, not how much time does it take to
> pass your eyes over the characters. In other words they
> are actually talking about comprehensibility.
> Unless I've made a mistake counting, that's less than 500 lines.
>> According to your view, ASM code is more readable than Python code. It's
>> just that there's more to read in ASM.
> What a ridiculous misrepresentation of my position. Readability is not
> proportional to length.
For someone who claims he's merely examining the language and seeking to
learn about it, Kiuhnm is jumping awfully quickly into the realm of
More information about the Python-list