breamoreboy at yahoo.co.uk
Thu Nov 1 01:36:30 CET 2012
On 01/11/2012 00:23, Robert Miles wrote:
> On 10/31/2012 4:38 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>> On 31/10/2012 19:35, rurpy at yahoo.com wrote:
>>> On 10/31/2012 09:11 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:> On 2012-09-16, ????????
>>> ?????? <nikos.gr33k at gmail.com> wrote:.
>>> "Broken"? Yes. But so is every piece of software in one way
>>> or another. Thunderbird is one of the most perpetually buggy
>>> pierces of software I have ever used on a continuing basis
>> Please provide evidence that Thunderbird is buggy. I use it quite
>> happily, don't have problems, and have never seen anybody complaining
>> about it.
> Why should they complain about it in this newsgroup?
I'm reading all the Python *MAILING LISTS* that I'm interested in with
Thunderbird. Here. Now. So do a lot of other people. If they weren't
happy with it, they'd be stating so here when this type of discussion
More information about the Python-list