How to improve the usability of nested packages

Michael Schwarz michi.schwarz at gmail.com
Sat Nov 3 09:54:43 CET 2012


Hi Terry

On 2012-W44-5, at 18:56, Terry Reedy wrote:

>> or would you maybe structure the library entirely different?
> 
> Based on my limited experience with subpackages* plus reports on this list about problems, such as yours, I have concluded that subpackages are an attractive nuisance that are generally more trouble than they are worth. I suggest you consider sticking with your original flat (no subpackage) design. (But maybe someone knows better than me how to make subpackages work ;-).

One thing that I would lose is the way I can choose very short names for the packages and modules that are imported into the local namespace (like sip or rtp) and also add new stuff without fearing a namespace conflict in one of the applications using the library.

I really hope there is a better way :-(.

Michael
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2227 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/attachments/20121103/5f18ca5b/attachment.bin>


More information about the Python-list mailing list