Yet another Python textbook
rosuav at gmail.com
Tue Nov 20 22:00:43 CET 2012
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 1:57 AM, <wxjmfauth at gmail.com> wrote:
> Le mardi 20 novembre 2012 09:09:50 UTC+1, Chris Angelico a écrit :
>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Pavel Solin <solin.pavel at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Perhaps you are right. Is there any statistics of how many Python
>> > programmers are using 2.7 vs. 3? Most of people I know use 2.7.
>> If you're teaching Python, the stats are probably about zero for zero.
>> Start them off on Py3 and help move the world forward.
> Do not count with me.
> The absurd flexible string representation has practically
> borrowed the idea to propose once Python has a teaching tool.
To the OP: jmf has an unnatural hatred of Python 3.3 and PEP 393
strings. Take no notice; the rest of the world sees this as a huge
advantage. Python is now in a VERY small group of languages (I'm aware
of just one other) that have absolutely proper Unicode handling *and*
efficient string handling.
More information about the Python-list