Decorators not worth the effort
Jean-Michel Pichavant
jeanmichel at sequans.com
Mon Sep 17 10:20:43 EDT 2012
----- Original Message -----
> Jean-Michel Pichavant wrote:
[snip]
> One minor note, the style of decorator you are using loses the
> docstring
> (at least) of the original function. I would add the
> @functools.wraps(func)
> decorator inside your decorator.
Is there a way to not loose the function signature as well ?
help (t.api.spuAgc)
> spuAgc(self, iterations, backoffTarget, step) method of ...
But once decorated with this:
def stdApi(func):
@functools.wraps(func)
def inner(self, *args, **kwargs):
rsp = func(self, *args, **kwargs)
result = TncCmnResult()
result.returnCode = self._getReturnCode(rsp)
return result
return inner
help (t.api.spuAgc)
> t.api.spuAgc(self, *args, **kwargs) method of ....
Quite annoying :-/
JM
More information about the Python-list
mailing list