Article on the future of Python
wxjmfauth at gmail.com
wxjmfauth at gmail.com
Wed Sep 26 11:17:57 EDT 2012
Le mercredi 26 septembre 2012 16:56:55 UTC+2, Chris Angelico a écrit :
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:50 AM, <wxjmfauth at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I just see the results and the facts. For an end
>
> > user, this is the only thing that counts.
>
>
>
> Then what counts is that Python 3.2 (like Javascript) exhibits
>
> incorrect behaviour, and Python (like Pike) performs correctly.
>
>
>
> I think this tee applies to you. http://www.thinkgeek.com/product/f147/
>
>
>
> ChrisA
>
> wouldn't have bothered to respond except that that link was asking to be shared
"You" have gained a broader range of unicode code points
and the same time you "broke" a correct BMP behaviour.
There is a simple solution to solve this. "You" do not wish
to use it.
Luckily for me, the tools I'm using use that one.
jmf
More information about the Python-list
mailing list