The type/object distinction and possible synthesis of OOP and imperative programming languages
rusi
rustompmody at gmail.com
Sun Apr 21 11:44:32 EDT 2013
On Apr 15, 8:48 am, Mark Janssen <dreamingforw... at gmail.com> wrote:
> That all being said, the thrust of this whole effort is to possibly
> advance Computer Science and language design, because in-between the
> purely concrete "object" architecture of the imperative programming
> languages and the purely abstract object architecture of
> object-oriented programming languages is a possible middle ground that
> could unite them all.
Just been poking around with eclipse.
And saw this: http://softwaresimplexity.blogspot.in/2013/02/where-java-fails.html
For context, the guy seems to be big in the java/eclipse community
[Or at least is well hyped -- he's finalist for eclipse' best
developer award]
This context is needed to underscore something he says in one of the
comments on that page:
"OO just sucks…"
More information about the Python-list
mailing list