TypeError: Can't convert 'int' object to str implicitly
tunacubes at gmail.com
tunacubes at gmail.com
Fri Apr 26 11:21:13 EDT 2013
On Friday, April 26, 2013 10:53:44 AM UTC-4, Peter Otten wrote:
> tunacubes at gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hey,
>
> >
>
> > Let me explain what my program is supposed to do...
>
> >
>
> > I am using a macro program in conjunction with a python script I am
>
> > writing. The macro inputs data into a database we use at my job, blah blah
>
> > blah.
>
> >
>
> > The script asks how many numbers (devices) you need to enter. Next, it
>
> > asks you to input the device numbers. When you input them, it creates a
>
> > list with all of the devices. I then tell it to go into the script of the
>
> > Macro (firstdev.ahk) that will run on the back-end, and replace the word
>
> > "device" with the first device in the list. It then should execute the
>
> > Macro, change the device number back to the word "Device" for future use,
>
> > and then delete the first number from the list. It will repeat as long as
>
> > there are numbers in the list.
>
> >
>
> > The error I receive is "TypeError: Can't convert 'int' object to str
>
> > implicitly" when it tries to put the device into the macro script.
>
>
>
> Python is trying hard to give you a meaningful error message and shows the
>
> line causing the error in the traceback. It pays to read carefully -- or to
>
> post it here if it doesn't make sense to you.
>
>
>
> > devlist = []
>
> ...
>
> > Number = int(input("Enter Device number: "))
>
> > devlist.append(Number)
>
> ...
>
> > line = line.replace(devlist[0], "device")
>
>
>
> devList is a list of integers, and devlist[0] is thus an int.
>
>
>
> >>> "foo device bar\n".replace(42, "device")
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>
> File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
>
> TypeError: Can't convert 'int' object to str implicitly
>
>
>
> Implicitly? So let's try and convert the int /explicitly/ .
>
>
>
> >>> "foo device bar\n".replace(str(42), "device")
>
> 'foo device bar\n'
>
>
>
> No error, but probably still not what you expected. Can you sort it out
>
> yourself?
>
>
>
> > I am fairly new to python, so if anything looks screwed up or like I am an
>
> > idiot, it is because I am.
>
>
>
> I like to see a bit of self-deprecation now and then, but on this list
>
> complete tracebacks find even more love ;)
Thank you, Peter. This was a tremendous help. Got it working.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list