Packaging a proprietary Python library for multiple OSs

Mark Lawrence breamoreboy at yahoo.co.uk
Thu Dec 5 18:22:57 CET 2013


On 05/12/2013 16:20, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 2:32 AM, Travis Griggs <travisgriggs at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 5, 2013, at 2:56 AM, rusi <rustompmody at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> 3. https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/python-virtualenv may be a better
>>> place to ask
>>
>> Am I the only one that sees the irony in this suggestion? Given the long running tirades^H^H^H^H^H^H thread about “Managing Google Groups headaches”?
>>
>> “Pleassse don’t use Google Groupssssesss. It’sss nasssty. It hurtssess our eyesssessss with itsss long linessssieesss. Unlessssss it hassss a ssspecial neeeeed. Then the groupssesss are OK, Yessss?"
>
> No, it's not like that. It's that there are some people who, despite
> truckloads of evidence to the contrary, still think that Google Groups
> is worth using. Rusi is one of them. Fortunately, he has defended his
> position by making his posts not look like the ridiculous junk that GG
> creates by default, but that doesn't make GG a good product. It's like
> an argument my boss and I had: I said that PHP is a bad language, and
> he said that it can't possibly be a bad language because he's able to
> write good code in it.
>
> I don't know what mailing list there is for virtualenv as I don't use
> it, but there's likely to be an alternative source of knowledge on it.
>
> ChrisA
>

gmane.comp.python.virtualenv

-- 
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask 
what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence




More information about the Python-list mailing list