Packaging a proprietary Python library for multiple OSs
breamoreboy at yahoo.co.uk
Thu Dec 5 18:22:57 CET 2013
On 05/12/2013 16:20, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 2:32 AM, Travis Griggs <travisgriggs at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Dec 5, 2013, at 2:56 AM, rusi <rustompmody at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 3. https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/python-virtualenv may be a better
>>> place to ask
>> Am I the only one that sees the irony in this suggestion? Given the long running tirades^H^H^H^H^H^H thread about “Managing Google Groups headaches”?
>> “Pleassse don’t use Google Groupssssesss. It’sss nasssty. It hurtssess our eyesssessss with itsss long linessssieesss. Unlessssss it hassss a ssspecial neeeeed. Then the groupssesss are OK, Yessss?"
> No, it's not like that. It's that there are some people who, despite
> truckloads of evidence to the contrary, still think that Google Groups
> is worth using. Rusi is one of them. Fortunately, he has defended his
> position by making his posts not look like the ridiculous junk that GG
> creates by default, but that doesn't make GG a good product. It's like
> an argument my boss and I had: I said that PHP is a bad language, and
> he said that it can't possibly be a bad language because he's able to
> write good code in it.
> I don't know what mailing list there is for virtualenv as I don't use
> it, but there's likely to be an alternative source of knowledge on it.
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
More information about the Python-list