Why Python is like C++
auriocus at gmx.de
Sat Dec 21 11:19:03 CET 2013
Am 21.12.13 09:06, schrieb Gregory Ewing:
> Michael Torrie wrote:
>> Maybe BASIC's of the 70s. But Not QB. QuickBasic was a pretty
>> impressive compiler in its day. Completely modern, structured language.
> I may have been thinking of GW-BASIC. There was
> definitely something that was pretty much an
> old-school BASIC with line numbers, GOSUBS and
> all that.
GW-BASIC was a weak language, but two significant characters is
definitely too few. I think it was eight. Never used QuickBasic, I went
Turbo Pascal instead, which had 32 significant characters.
More information about the Python-list