cascading python executions only if return code is 0

Roy Smith roy at panix.com
Fri Dec 27 17:42:36 CET 2013


In article <mailman.4668.1388160953.18130.python-list at python.org>,
 Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed at ix.netcom.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 26 Dec 2013 23:29:30 -0500, Roy Smith <roy at panix.com> declaimed the
> following:
> 
> >
> >NTP is never supposed to move the clock backwards.  If your system clock 
> >is fast, it's supposed to reduce the rate your clock runs until it's 
> >back in sync.  Well, maybe it only does that for small corrections?
> 
> 	Especially likely when one considers that M$ Windows only does a time
> synch once a week.

When I attempt to reason about what is possible and what is impossible 
in a program, I assume a sane universe.  Windows violates that 
assumption.  I am not responsible for what happens after that.

People complain that Python 3 has been out for 5 years and the world is 
still dragging its feet upgrading from Python 2.  NTP has been around 
for almost 30 years.

Keeping a bunch of clocks on a network in sync is a solved problem.  The 
world really needs to move on to new problems like how to deal with more 
than 2^32 devices on a network.  Or how to deal with languages where 26 
letters isn't enough.



More information about the Python-list mailing list