Bug reports [was Re: Python list code of conduct]
roy at panix.com
Wed Jul 3 16:23:35 CEST 2013
In article <mailman.4170.1372860945.3114.python-list at python.org>,
Chris Angelico <rosuav at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 12:03 AM, Roy Smith <roy at panix.com> wrote:
> > In article <mailman.4153.1372838561.3114.python-list at python.org>,
> > Chris Angelico <rosuav at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Of course, it's possible for there to be dark corners. But if you're
> >> working with those, you know it full well. The dark corners of Python
> >> might be in some of its more obscure modules, or maybe in IPv6
> >> handling,
> > The sad thing about this statement is that IPv6 has been around for
> > about as long as Python.
> Yeah, and yet so many ISPs simply don't support it (only one of the
> Australian ISPs I've worked with does - Internode).
My comment was not meant as a flame against Python, but as a flame
against the whole frigging Internet industry for dragging their feet(*)
on IPv6 rollout.
(*) It is difficult to walk with any gait other than foot-dragging when
you are suffering from a severe case of cranio-rectal inversion.
More information about the Python-list