RE Module Performance
rosuav at gmail.com
Fri Jul 12 11:40:52 CEST 2013
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Joshua Landau <joshua at landau.ws> wrote:
> On 12 July 2013 10:27, Chris Angelico <rosuav at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 7:23 PM, <wxjmfauth at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I would not care too much about the performance
>>> of re.
>>> With the new Flexible String Representation, you
>>> can use a logarithmic scale to compare re results.
>>> To be honest, there is improvment if you are an
>>> ascii user.
>>> Am I the only one who tested this? Probably.
>> Am I the only one who thinks that Dihedral posted under jmf's name?
> A bot posting as a troll to troll a different troll? Meta.
Yeah, it is. But the only other explanation is that jmf has become
rather more incomprehensible than usual. Normally I can understand
what he's complaining enough to refute it, but here I feel like I'm
responding to Dihedral.
More information about the Python-list