Why do Perl programmers make more money than Python programmers
88888 Dihedral
dihedral88888 at googlemail.com
Tue May 7 16:41:58 EDT 2013
Chris Angelico於 2013年5月7日星期二UTC+8下午9時32分55秒寫道:
> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 11:22 PM, jmfauth <wxjmfauth at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > There are plenty of good reasons to use Python. There are
>
> > also plenty of good reasons to not use (or now to drop)
>
> > Python and to realize that if you wish to process text
>
> > seriously, you are better served by using "corporate
>
> > products" or tools using Unicode properly.
>
>
>
> There are plenty of good reasons to use Python. One of them is the
>
> laughs you can get any time jmf posts here. There are also plenty of
>
> good reasons to drop Python. One of them is because corporate products
>
> like Microsoft Visual Studio are inherently better specifically
>
> because they cost you money, and there's no way that something you
>
> paid nothing for can ever be as good as that. Plus, you get to write
>
People used MS products because most bosses did not want to pay
the prices of work stations, the minis, or the main-frames and
the salaries of the system administrators in 199x.
> code that works on only one platform, and that's really good. Finally,
>
> moving off Python would mean you don't feel obliged to respond to jmf,
>
> which will increase your productivity measurably.
>
>
>
> ChrisA
The price issue of a software package or a platform is not
the only way to judge a programming language.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list