A Pragmatic Case for Static Typing
Roy Smith
roy at panix.com
Mon Sep 2 08:41:21 EDT 2013
In article <7xfvtnwsn9.fsf at ruckus.brouhaha.com>,
Paul Rubin <no.email at nospam.invalid> wrote:
> "Russ P." <Russ.Paielli at gmail.com> writes:
> > I just stumbled across this video and found it interesting:
> > http://vimeo.com/72870631
> > My apologies if it has been posted here already.
>
> The slides for it are here, so I didn't bother watching the 1 hour video:
>
> http://gbaz.github.io/slides/hurt-statictyping-07-2013.pdf
Thank you for posting that.
My favorite slide (especially since for the past few years, I've mostly
worked in 3 person teams).
> Brian's Observation:
>
> At 3 people on a team, there is a 50% chance that
>> at least one of them is a full-time idiot.
>
> As the teams grow larger, the probability of not
> having an idiot on the team falls rapidly to zero.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list