Making every no-arg method a property?
Rob Gaddi
rgaddi at technologyhighland.invalid
Wed Aug 6 12:53:16 EDT 2014
On Wed, 6 Aug 2014 05:13:07 +0000 (UTC)
Grant Edwards <invalid at invalid.invalid> wrote:
> On 2014-08-05, Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:
> > Grant Edwards wrote:
> >> Did I miss a news story? Have the parentesis mines all exploded
> >> causing the price of parenthesis to skyrocket?
> >
> > The Unicode Consortium has been secretly buying them
> > up for some time now. Pretty soon you won't be able
> > to get cheap ASCII parentheses any more, only the
> > fancy high-priced ones like U+2045/U+2046,
> > U+2772/U+2773 and U+27E6/U+27E7.
>
> Damn. Time to buy some options...
>
> --
> Grant
>
No, no. Options use up commas, not parentheses. Maybe equals signs if
you're feeling particularly verbose.
Clearly there's a market for some sort of well-diversified punctuation
fund. The only problem becomes listing it.
--
Rob Gaddi, Highland Technology -- www.highlandtechnology.com
Email address domain is currently out of order. See above to fix.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list