On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 2:12 AM, Peter Pearson <ppearson at nowhere.invalid> wrote: > MK Shen used to hang out on the sci.crypt newsgroup, so we're > probably talking "cryptographically large" rather than "engineeringly > large". So "fairly large" means somewhere between googolplex an Graham's Number, and after that they'd be called "very large"? ChrisA