The potential for a Python 2.8.

[Grant Edwards]

On 2014-01-25, Roy Smith <roy at panix.com> wrote:
> In article <lbu1an$3rb$1 at reader1.panix.com>,
>  Grant Edwards <invalid at invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>> On 2014-01-24, Roy Smith <roy at panix.com> wrote:
>> > In article <mailman.5927.1390530488.18130.python-list at python.org>,
>> >  Chris Angelico <rosuav at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Roy Smith <roy at panix.com> wrote:
>> >> >> Python 2.8j?
>> >> >
>> >> > You're imagining things.
>> >> 
>> >> Get real... s'not gonna happen.
>> >> 
>> > I wouldn't bet on that.  The situation keeps getting tensor and
>> > tensor.
>> 
>> I have a feeling there's a pun there based on the worlds "real" and
>> "tensor", but I don't have the math skills required to figure it out.
>
> You must be pretty weak in math, then.

It was more of reading problem. I completely failed to notice the "j"
and the "imagining".  Now I get it.

> This really isn't that complex.

I refuse to become a vector for the spread of these bad puns.

-- 
Grant