OT: usenet reader software
invalid at invalid.invalid
Tue Jul 22 23:57:13 CEST 2014
On 2014-07-22, Monte Milanuk <memilanuk at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2014-07-22, Grant Edwards <invalid at invalid.invalid> wrote:
>> On 2014-07-22, Monte Milanuk <memilanuk at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 2014-07-22, ismeal shanshi <stuffstorehouse2014 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> [drugs for sale]
>>> Aaaannnd here we have a good example of why it would be really nice
>>> to be able to filter/score based on the message *body*, not just the
>>> headers. 8(
>> slrn filtered that out just fine based on headers alone, thank you.
>> So, I didn't see it at all until you quoted the whole thing.
>> Here's the relevent slrn scoring rule:
>> Score:: =-9999
>> Message-ID: .*googlegroups.com
> True... but what if I don't want to be quite that elitist and black-ball
> every one posting via google groups? Some mailing lists I read via
> gmane *originate* on google groups (web2py list, for one).
There are one or two mailing lists that originate on GG, and I don't
apply the rule to those lists.
> Other people posting from google groups are not
> malicious/trolls/jerks/spammers -
True. But if they persist in posting via a well-known span-conduit
that's also famous for various other breakages, then I don't see how
they can be too surprised that not everybody sees their posts.
I occasionally disable that rule, and it's never seemed like I was
missing anything valuable.
> Maybe slrn needs an upgrade to gracefully handle html formatted messages
> - good bad or otherwise, they're pretty much here to stay, kind of like
> google groups. There are programs like lynx, elinks, etc. that can
> handle simple html via a cli program... so its not entirely beyond the
> realm of possibility.
Even if they were nicely formatted, I'd still probably plonk GG posts
just to avoid the garbage.
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! An Italian is COMBING
at his hair in suburban DES
More information about the Python-list