Python ORM library for distributed mostly-read-only objects?
Lie Ryan
lie.1296 at gmail.com
Mon Jun 23 11:54:38 EDT 2014
On 22/06/14 10:46, smurfix at gmail.com wrote:
>
> I've been doing this with a "classic" session-based SQLAlchemy ORM, approach, but that ends up way too slow and memory intense, as each thread gets its own copy of every object it needs. I don't want that.
If you don't want each thread to have their own copy of the object,
Don't use thread-scoped session. Use explicit scope instead.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list