ben+python at benfinney.id.au
Wed Mar 5 22:10:32 CET 2014
Marko Rauhamaa <marko at pacujo.net> writes:
> Grant Edwards <invalid at invalid.invalid>:
> > Wrong. If the two objects are not the same, then they will have
> > different ID values. If the ID values are the same, then you've only
> > got one object.
> Ok, that circularity again.
Yes, it's circular. In an abstract system like a programming language,
where the definition only needs to describe behaviour of that system,
what is your objection to circularity of definition?
A great many abstract systems designed by humans are defined in terms
that are ultimately circular. This does not in any way hinder them from
being useful definitions of useful systems.
\ “All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more |
`\ robust, sophisticated and well supported in logic and argument |
_o__) than others.” —Douglas Adams |
More information about the Python-list