ben+python at benfinney.id.au
Thu Mar 6 02:05:18 CET 2014
Marko Rauhamaa <marko at pacujo.net> writes:
> Ben Finney <ben+python at benfinney.id.au>:
> > Then this does not count as a leaky abstraction. All you're saying is
> > that the ‘id(foo)’ result is a representation of the object identity,
> > which is entirely at the level of the abstraction. Nothing is leaked.
> I wasn't making a point about a leaky abstraction.
Can we conclude that you've changed your position on this, then? You now
accept that Python's object identity abstraction is not leaky?
In the absence of you demonstrating a leak in that abstraction, we can
ignore the assertion.
\ “For myself, I am an optimist — it does not seem to be much use |
`\ being anything else.” —Winston Churchill, 1954-11-09 |
More information about the Python-list