running python 2 vs 3
breamoreboy at yahoo.co.uk
Thu Mar 20 23:42:39 CET 2014
On 20/03/2014 22:23, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
> Ned Batchelder <ned at nedbatchelder.com>:
>> On 3/20/14 4:59 PM, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
>>> Well, with proper care, I suppose the same code base could support perl
>>> as well. ;)
>> I'm not sure how to take this comment. I feel like you are mocking my
>> choice. I wanted to make coverage.py available to as broad an audience
>> as possible, something that I think is worthwhile. Yes, there was an
>> engineering cost, but the tradeoff was worth it.
> I can't judge if your particular choice was the right one. My only point
> is that python2 and python3 are so far apart as to be regarded as
> independent languages.
And I still say this is complete nonsense.
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
More information about the Python-list