How about some syntactic sugar for " __name__ == '__main__' "?
ian.g.kelly at gmail.com
Wed Nov 12 23:19:09 CET 2014
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Chris Kaynor <ckaynor at zindagigames.com> wrote:
> I was thinking along the lines of replacing:
> if __name__ == "__main__":
> <<<block of code>>>
> def myFunction()
> <<<<block of code>>
> Both blocks of code will be called at the same time.
99% of the time the content of <<<block of code>>> is just "main()",
so then you're proposing replacing this:
if __name__ == "__main__":
Which feels redundant to me. Why have a function here that does
nothing but call another function?
I think if this is the goal then a simple predicate would be clearer:
More information about the Python-list