PyEval_GetLocals and unreferenced variables
kasper at phi-sci.com
Wed Nov 26 11:46:28 CET 2014
> > def fun():
> > q=3
> > def fun2():
> > cfun()
> > fun2()
> > fun()
> > and access 'q' inside the C-function cfun(). If I simply let it call
> > PyEval_GetLocals, then the result will again not contain "q". Is
> > there any way in which I can convince python to pull 'q' into the
> > local scope from within my C code?
> Wouldn't this be a little surprising? Why not simply pass q as a
I agree that in this example that would be the natural thing to do.
My case is more tricky though: I have something like
So the Python side actually doesn't see 'q' directly at all.
I am willing to elaborate on this if you want (I have fairly good
reasons to do things this way, mostly having to do with historical
constraints of an older C library that I cannot avoid), but it
requires more space.
More information about the Python-list