marko at pacujo.net
Wed Oct 29 20:44:55 CET 2014
Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy at yahoo.co.uk>:
> Regarding 2) Python has somehow managed without optional types for
> over 20 years so it's my belief that they're not the panacea that so
> many people think they are. Sure if they get implemented and if they
> improve Python then I'm all for them, but I'm not holding my breath.
I'm afraid of stylistic chaos and optional types turning into de-facto
mandatory types as modules interface each other.
More information about the Python-list