[OT] Question about Git branches

Frank Millman frank at chagford.com
Tue Sep 16 10:59:34 CEST 2014


"Chris Angelico" <rosuav at gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:CAPTjJmr5gh8=1zPjG_KdTmA2QgT_5jj=kh=jyvRFv1atL1EeKw at mail.gmail.com...
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Marko Rauhamaa <marko at pacujo.net> wrote:
>> "Frank Millman" <frank at chagford.com>:
>>
>>> You are encouraged to make liberal use of 'branches',
>>
>> Personally, I only use forks, IOW, "git clone". I encourage that
>> practice. Then, there is little need for "git checkout". Instead, I just
>> cd to a different directory.
>>
>> Branches and clones are highly analogous processwise; I would go so far
>> as to say that they are redundant.
>
> But rather than listening to, shall we say, *strange* advice like
> this, Frank, you'll do well to pick up a reliable git tutorial, which
> should explain branches, commits, the working tree, etc, etc, etc.
>

I don't want to turn this into a full-on Git discussion, so briefly -

1. I have read all the 'git' tutorials I can find, but they have not 
addressed my question.
2. Albert's response 'commit or stash files before switching branches' makes 
sense, and actually answers my question.
3. I have sympathy for Marko's position of using clones rather than 
branches. I realise it does not follow the 'git' philosophy, but it does 
make it more obvious 'where you are', and lessens the chances of shooting 
yourself in the foot.

Frank






More information about the Python-list mailing list