GCD in Fractions
breamoreboy at yahoo.co.uk
Tue Sep 23 21:30:46 CEST 2014
On 23/09/2014 18:43, blindanagram wrote:
> On 23/09/2014 18:26, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> Wolfgang Maier schrieb am 23.09.2014 um 18:38:
>>> While at first I thought this to be a rather irrelevant debate over module
>>> private vs public naming conventions, I now think the OP is probably right
>>> and renaming fractions.gcd to fractions._gcd may be a good idea.
>> For negative numbers, the "expected" behaviour seems to be unclear, so the
>> current behaviour is just as good as any, so backwards compatibility
>> concerns clearly win this fight.
> The expected behaviour is not unclear for anyone who takes the
> mathematical properties of the GCD seriously. It's a shame that Python
All you need do is raise an issue on the bug tracker, provide a patch to
code, test and docs and the job is done.
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
More information about the Python-list